Renewed War on Drugs, harsher charging policies, stepped-up criminalization of immigrants — in the current climate, joining the NACDL is more important than ever. Members of NACDL help to support the only national organization working at all levels of government to ensure that the voice of the defense bar is heard.
Take a stand for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system
Contact members of congress, sign petitions, and more
Help us continue our fight by donating to NFCJ
Help shape the future of the association
Join the dedicated and passionate team at NACDL
Increase brand exposure while building trust and credibility
NACDL is committed to enhancing the capacity of the criminal defense bar to safeguard fundamental constitutional rights.
NACDL harnesses the unique perspectives of NACDL members to advocate for policy and practice improvements in the criminal legal system.
NACDL envisions a society where all individuals receive fair, rational, and humane treatment within the criminal legal system.
NACDL’s mission is to serve as a leader, alongside diverse coalitions, in identifying and reforming flaws and inequities in the criminal legal system, and redressing systemic racism, and ensuring that its members and others in the criminal defense bar are fully equipped to serve all accused persons at the highest level.
Showing 1 - 15 of 33 results
Sample Motion to Suppress Keyword Search Warrant Template
Order granting the defendant's request for the Colorado Supreme Court to hear argument on a reverse keyword warrant after the district court's ruling.
The Colorado Supreme Court's ruling on the Rule 21 petition in the Seymour case.
The attached motion to suppress from People v. Seymour challenges the constitutionality of a reverse keyword warrant served on Google for anyone who searched for a particular physical address over 15 days. If you have a reverse search case or additional questions, please contact the Fourth Amendment Center at 4ac@nacdl.org
Attached is the Superior Court's order permitting the suppression of evidence from a geofence warrant in People v. Dawes. The Fourth Amendment Center's litigation director was co-counsel for the defendant. If you have a geofence case or questions about geofence warrants, please reach out the Center at 4ac@nacdl.org.
Motion to Suppress Geofence Warrant (ECF 29)
Geofence Discovery Motion
Reply brief of the appellant in US v. Chatrie. Michael Price, the Fourth Amendment Center's Litigation Director, is co-counsel for Mr. Chatrie.
Below is a the Joint Appendix to the US v Chatrie appeal brief filed by the Center's Litigation Director, Michael Price, and Co-counsel. This case contains the use of a Geofence Warrant
Amicus Brief by Google in Support of Neither Party
Amicus Brief filed by American Civil Liberities Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Virgina, and Eight Federal Public Defender Office in US v. Chatrie in support of the appelate. Our litigation director is co-counsel for the appelate.
This redacted motion aims to serve as an example for attorneys drafting similar motions to suppress evidence from geofence warrants.
Dawes Motion to Suppress Geofence Warrant
The full appeal brief as filed attached below.
Geofence warrants are a type of reverse warrant where the government seeks to know who was within a “geofence,” a defined physical area during a specific period of time. These are a type of “reverse warrant,” used to identify suspects when none are known without the data gathered by the warrant. The government utilizes geofence warrants to compel companies, such as Google, to produce information about devices interacting with their technology within a particular geographic region, which often includes many people who are wholly unconnected to the event being investigated.