Release with Least-Restrictive Conditions Favored Over Financial Bail; Defendants Should Get Jail Credit for Court-Supervised Release
Washington, DC (July 30, 2012) – The Board of Directors of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) approved the first major bail reform policy proposal in over 25 years at its Annual Meeting in San Francisco July 28. The policy was proposed by the Association’s Task Force on Pretrial Justice after a year of study.
NACDL President Steven D. Benjamin explained, “The proposal emphasizes release over detention, with a preference for personal recognizance in most cases. For those persons who do not qualify for release on personal recognizance, NACDL supports standards requiring judicial officers to release the defendant with the least onerous conditions possible.”
According to the policy, the bond decision should begin with considering release on personal recognizance, unless the court makes an evidence-based determination that personal bond will not reasonably assure the accused’s future appearance in court or assure the safety of others or the community. For defendants the court finds unqualified for personal recognizance, NACDL supports the development of standards requiring judicial officers to order release on the least onerous conditions possible.
Financial bail (often known as cash or secured bonds) disproportionately disadvantages indigent and working class defendants who lack the financial resources to secure release, resulting in unnecessarily prolonged periods of pretrial detention, even though they may pose no substantial risk of flight or danger to the community. Pretrial detention not only results in such collateral consequences as loss of employment and eviction from housing, and detained individuals are markedly disadvantaged in assisting counsel in preparation for trial. Pretrial detention also effectively coerces even innocent defendants into pleading guilty in exchange for a sentence of “time-served.”
In the vast majority of cases, particularly non-violent offenses, pretrial supervision can ensure a defendant’s appearance and public safety without the discriminatory and disparate impact of financial bonds. But NACDL acknowledges in the proposal that a monetary bond may be appropriate in a limited number of cases, provided that the bail is not excessive.
The policy cites U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s assertion that “[a]lmost all of these [detained] individuals could be released and supervised in their communities – and allowed to pursue and maintain employment and participate in educational opportunities and their normal family lives – without risk of endangering their fellow citizens or fleeing from justice.”
The bail reform debate has waxed and waned many times since the 1968 Crime Control Act. What is new this time is that NACDL’s proposal recognizes that conditional release still imposes substantial restrictions on liberty. Curfews, restrictions on travel or employment, mandatory reporting do not allow accused persons, who are presumed innocent, the same freedoms they enjoyed before arrest. Therefore NACDL advocates that defendants released under any significant pretrial restriction of his liberty, including home confinement, should get credit against any future sentence.
A chief proponent of the credit for significant liberty restrictions, NACDL President-Elect Jerry J. Cox, advocates for the credit any time there is a deprivation of liberty, including (but not limited to) home detention, electronic monitoring (“ankle bracelet”), drug testing, restricted work release, or in any case where the individual is required to pay for pretrial supervision.
Vital to bail reform is the proposal that jurisdictions create independent pretrial services agencies to conduct background investigations to advise the court with evidence-based release and bail recommendations. Verified information and recommendations allow for more accurate decision-making, the proposal says. If the court determines that supervised release is appropriate, the pretrial services agency would be responsible for supervising, monitoring and counseling the defendant while his case is pending.
Immediate Past President Lisa M. Wayne, who initiated the proposal and organized the Task Force on Pretrial Justice, emphasized that “This is the first step in a long-overdue overhaul of an outdated and unfair process that favors the haves over the have-nots and is a major factor contributing to mass incarceration in this country.”
Ms. Wayne and Mr. Benjamin will continue to work actively with the task force to implement bail reform nationwide.
The policy report is on NACDL’s website at http://www.nacdl.org/resolutions/2012am1.
Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy Guide
NACDL’s Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence will assist criminal defense practitioners in scoring points when cross-examining forensic experts in cases involving DNA and biological evidence. This resource contains thousands of questions that will help defense lawyers cross-examine challenging witnesses without reinventing the wheel with each new case. It includes pattern questions that can be used to dominate prosecution DNA experts and level the playing field at trial.
Cross-Examination of the Analyst in Drug Prosecutions (2nd Ed.) By James M. Shellow
Now in its second edition with some new material, James M. Shellow’s book offers what its title promises: ways of thinking about cross-examining the forensic analysts in drug cases. But the book is so much more than that. It offers a look inside the mind of one of the finest cross-examiners and defense lawyers the United States has produced in the last seventy years. This small book can inspire and direct you in making big changes in the way you defend your clients and think about the entire project of trying any case.
Justice For All, Justice Now White T-Shirt (Women’s)
This custom, vintage-faded NACDL t-shirt is 50% polyester, 25% cotton, and 25% rayon weighing 5.2 oz. and is lightwieght, flexible and soft, providing maximum comfort. It features the "Justice For All, Justice Now" slogan and Lady Liberty image on the front, with the NACDL logo on the back. Currently available in both men's and women's sizes in both black and white colors. View the full line-up of colors and sizes on our online store, as well as our other popular and best-selling t-shirt designs at: nacdl.org/store.
Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection - CD-ROM
NACDL’s Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection is the sweeping culmination of every single article of written materials ever published from each installment of NACDL's annual "Defending Modern Drug Cases" seminar. Totaling over 12,000 pages, this vast collection includes 12+ years of motions, briefs, reports, outlines, transcripts, case citations, scholarly articles, powerpoints and other written commentaries. This collection provides trial strategies and tactics you can immediately apply to your current cases.
Mental Illness & the Law: Addressing and Litigating Behavioral Health Disorders in Criminal Cases
Whether it is insanity, impairment, a disorder, or adolescent brain development; mental health and intellectual competence issues affect pretrial supervision, trial and sentencing, and your chances of successfully advocating for your impaired client. This training provides ideas and proven solutions to assist you in advocating for your client during trial, whether it be insanity defenses, jury selection, cross of expert witnesses, persuasion, or mitigation at sentencing.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.