Legal ‘Sacred Cows’ Must Go
Chicago, IL (November 4, 1999) -- The nation’s preeminent criminal defense bar association today said that, short of abolition of the death penalty or a moratorium on executions, proposed reforms to Illinois’ capital punishment system must include implementation of new procedural safeguards aimed specifically at police and prosecutors in order to avoid further wrongful convictions.
At a press conference in Chicago, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) announced that Illinois is to be commended for recognizing the need for reform in light of the record number of death row inmates later to have been found innocent. NACDL acknowledged that recently adopted measures to substantially increase defense funding are a meaningful step in the right direction.
However, the Association noted that investigation into the causes of the dozen wrongful capital convictions has clearly shown that major reforms of practices by the police and prosecutors are required to ensure that more innocent people are not sentenced to die in Illinois.
“It is time to expose and speak truthfully about the ‘sacred cows’ in the criminal justice system,” said NACDL president William Moffitt. “These falsehoods include the belief that jailhouse informants always tell the truth, that an innocent person would not give a false confession and that eyewitnesses are never mistaken. If the twelve Illinois exonerations have taught us any lesson, they are that jail house informants often lie, that innocent people--especially if coerced or threatened by police -- do confess crimes they did not commit, and that eyewitness testimony is more often mistaken than we tend to believe.”
Moffitt said that the accused, particularly in death cases, must be protected from abusive and unconstitutional practices by police and prosecutors through the implementation of specific procedural safeguards. “It is simply good government to have a justice system that provides the people of Illinois with these protections,” he said.
NACDL’s recommendations include:
- Eliminating ‘single witness identification’ -- As was demonstrated in the Anthony Porter case, a single eyewitness’ testimony is too unreliable to be the basis of a death sentence. In a case in which identity rests primarily on the testimony of one eyewitness, the death penalty should not be an option.
- Requiring reliability hearings for government informants -- Case after case in Illinois, including the case of the Ford Heights Four, has demonstrated that there is every reason to doubt the word of jailhouse informants who have endless opportunity and motive to implicate others. Illinois would be well-served by following the example of Oklahoma and allowing jailhouse informant testimony in death penalty cases only after the trial court holds a hearing to decide a number of questions that are critical to a threshold determination that the testimony is sufficiently reliable to be presented at trial. Such questions include: whether the informant has received or will receive anything in exchange for testifying; whether the informant has testified or offered evidence in other cases and any benefit there received; the manner in which the statement from the accused was obtained; and the informant’s criminal history.
- Requiring videotaping of all interrogations -- False confessions of guilt are often the result of physical abuse, coercion or other unlawful police practices. Sadly, Illinois has also produced wrongful convictions in cases where police officers simply fabricated a claim that the accused confessed. In order to reach a just verdict, juries must be able to evaluate the truthfulness and reliability of such statements. The best way to do this is through videotaping of interrogations so that jurors can see and hear a videotape of the interrogation process leading up to the confession and the confession itself. The death penalty should not be an option if the interrogation and confession is not videotaped.
Moffitt noted that the spate of wrongful convictions in Illinois and the current lack of effective procedural safeguards calls into question the validity of the death penalty in cases that are on appeal and in post-conviction status. “We urge the Illinois state legislature to consider the absence of fairness and reliability that unquestionably resulted in twelve wrongful capital convictions before considering whether any executions should go forward,” he said.
Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy Guide
NACDL’s Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence will assist criminal defense practitioners in scoring points when cross-examining forensic experts in cases involving DNA and biological evidence. This resource contains thousands of questions that will help defense lawyers cross-examine challenging witnesses without reinventing the wheel with each new case. It includes pattern questions that can be used to dominate prosecution DNA experts and level the playing field at trial.
Cross-Examination of the Analyst in Drug Prosecutions (2nd Ed.) By James M. Shellow
Now in its second edition with some new material, James M. Shellow’s book offers what its title promises: ways of thinking about cross-examining the forensic analysts in drug cases. But the book is so much more than that. It offers a look inside the mind of one of the finest cross-examiners and defense lawyers the United States has produced in the last seventy years. This small book can inspire and direct you in making big changes in the way you defend your clients and think about the entire project of trying any case.
Justice For All, Justice Now White T-Shirt (Women’s)
This custom, vintage-faded NACDL t-shirt is 50% polyester, 25% cotton, and 25% rayon weighing 5.2 oz. and is lightwieght, flexible and soft, providing maximum comfort. It features the "Justice For All, Justice Now" slogan and Lady Liberty image on the front, with the NACDL logo on the back. Currently available in both men's and women's sizes in both black and white colors. View the full line-up of colors and sizes on our online store, as well as our other popular and best-selling t-shirt designs at: nacdl.org/store.
Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection - CD-ROM
NACDL’s Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection is the sweeping culmination of every single article of written materials ever published from each installment of NACDL's annual "Defending Modern Drug Cases" seminar. Totaling over 12,000 pages, this vast collection includes 12+ years of motions, briefs, reports, outlines, transcripts, case citations, scholarly articles, powerpoints and other written commentaries. This collection provides trial strategies and tactics you can immediately apply to your current cases.
Mental Illness & the Law: Addressing and Litigating Behavioral Health Disorders in Criminal Cases
Whether it is insanity, impairment, a disorder, or adolescent brain development; mental health and intellectual competence issues affect pretrial supervision, trial and sentencing, and your chances of successfully advocating for your impaired client. This training provides ideas and proven solutions to assist you in advocating for your client during trial, whether it be insanity defenses, jury selection, cross of expert witnesses, persuasion, or mitigation at sentencing.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.