Washington, DC (August 27, 2007) – An Ohio public defender was fined $100 and given a three-day suspended sentence for refusing to go to trial unprepared in a multi-witness assault case the same day he was appointed. Portage County Municipal Court Judge John Plough imposed the sentence on Brian Jones after a three-hour hearing late Friday afternoon.
The sole witness at the contempt hearing was Arkansas lawyer and legal ethics expert John Wesley Hall, president-elect of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). Jones was represented by NACDL member Ian Friedman of Cleveland, who questioned Hall for more than an hour about the ethics of the situation Jones was in. Hall was also questioned by the court.
The alleged contempt arose a week earlier on the day defendant Jordan Scott was scheduled to go to trial on the misdemeanor assault charge. The Portage County Public Defender’s Office was appointed to represent Scott on August 16. When Jones entered his appearance at 11:00 a.m. the next day, he learned that the case was set for trial that very day. The young attorney advised the court that he was unprepared for trial that day, but Judge Plough continued the case to 1:30 p.m., giving Jones 2-1/2 hours to prepare for trial. The public defender''s office has a policy against going to trial on a day’s notice, a common occurrence in Judge Plough''s court.
Jones tried to remind Judge Plough of his office’s policy, which he said the court had notice of, but the judge cut him off and ordered him arrested in open court. A deputy sheriff took the young lawyer into custody and confined him to an empty room in the courthouse where he was held for five hours before posting $100 bond. Plough continued the contempt hearing until August 24, and berated defendant Scott for not finding his own lawyer before trial.
The Ravenna Record-Courier reported that the incident was not the first time that the judge had threatened a public defender with contempt when appearing after being appointed with little time to prepare.
Ohio defense lawyers were outraged over Jones’ treatment and contacted NACDL. Portage County chief public defender Dennis Lager noted that defense lawyers have an ethical and legal duty to represent their clients competently and effectively, and not to go to trial unprepared.
After a number of phone consultations with Lager’s office and the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, NACDL President Carmen Hernandez, reaffirming the NACDL’s dedication to the right of indigent defendants to constitutionally-effective assistance of counsel, issued a statement condemning the Judge’s jailing of the public defender for standing up for his client’s Sixth Amendment rights. The NACDL press release was sent to news media and posted on the organization’s Web site.
“For the scales of justice to be balanced, both the prosecution and the defense must be prepared,” Hernandez said. “Asking a lawyer to go to trial without preparation is like asking a doctor to perform surgery before diagnosing the patient. Harm is inevitable”
NACDL President Hernandez joined Immediate Past President Martin S. Pinales of Cincinnati and NACDL’s Indigent Defense Counsel, Malia Brink on a conference call to discuss what the association could do to help. Friedman volunteered to represent Jones pro bono and Hall volunteered his services as an expert witness. Thanks in part to media coverage – Jones’ arrest was reported in the press from Cleveland to Pittsburgh and also on ABC News’ Web page – the courtroom was packed for Jones’ sentencing on August 24.
“Most of the lawyers in the area showed up,” Hall said. There were a lot of reporters in the courtroom also, from as far away as Pittsburgh, but Hall had to remain outside until he was called to the stand. Expert witnesses can be excluded from hearings in the discretion of the trial judge.
Hall testified that no one could prepare adequately for trial in 2 1/2 hours. “Nobody could. I couldn’t.”
During the sentencing hearing, the judge seemed to defend his action, stressing that he insisted that the defense go to trial as scheduled to avoid inconveniencing the prosecution’s witnesses. The witnesses had been under subpoena for two weeks, even though Scott had no lawyer until Jones was appointed. Plough also said that as a compromise, he would have granted Jones a continuance after the prosecutor had presented its case-in-chief. But, as Hall explained, without having spoken to the defendant’s witnesses cross-examination of the state’s witnesses would not have been meaningful at all because there would be no defense theory for cross-examination. The judge also noted in passing that most defendants plead guilty in his court anyway.
Jones was also assessed less than $50 restitution to compensate two of the state’s civilian witnesses who took a day off from work to attend the trial.
Friedman says that his client will appeal.
Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy Guide
NACDL’s Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence will assist criminal defense practitioners in scoring points when cross-examining forensic experts in cases involving DNA and biological evidence. This resource contains thousands of questions that will help defense lawyers cross-examine challenging witnesses without reinventing the wheel with each new case. It includes pattern questions that can be used to dominate prosecution DNA experts and level the playing field at trial.
Cross-Examination of the Analyst in Drug Prosecutions (2nd Ed.) By James M. Shellow
Now in its second edition with some new material, James M. Shellow’s book offers what its title promises: ways of thinking about cross-examining the forensic analysts in drug cases. But the book is so much more than that. It offers a look inside the mind of one of the finest cross-examiners and defense lawyers the United States has produced in the last seventy years. This small book can inspire and direct you in making big changes in the way you defend your clients and think about the entire project of trying any case.
Justice For All, Justice Now White T-Shirt (Women’s)
This custom, vintage-faded NACDL t-shirt is 50% polyester, 25% cotton, and 25% rayon weighing 5.2 oz. and is lightwieght, flexible and soft, providing maximum comfort. It features the "Justice For All, Justice Now" slogan and Lady Liberty image on the front, with the NACDL logo on the back. Currently available in both men's and women's sizes in both black and white colors. View the full line-up of colors and sizes on our online store, as well as our other popular and best-selling t-shirt designs at: nacdl.org/store.
Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection - CD-ROM
NACDL’s Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection is the sweeping culmination of every single article of written materials ever published from each installment of NACDL's annual "Defending Modern Drug Cases" seminar. Totaling over 12,000 pages, this vast collection includes 12+ years of motions, briefs, reports, outlines, transcripts, case citations, scholarly articles, powerpoints and other written commentaries. This collection provides trial strategies and tactics you can immediately apply to your current cases.
Mental Illness & the Law: Addressing and Litigating Behavioral Health Disorders in Criminal Cases
Whether it is insanity, impairment, a disorder, or adolescent brain development; mental health and intellectual competence issues affect pretrial supervision, trial and sentencing, and your chances of successfully advocating for your impaired client. This training provides ideas and proven solutions to assist you in advocating for your client during trial, whether it be insanity defenses, jury selection, cross of expert witnesses, persuasion, or mitigation at sentencing.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.