Washington, DC (Aug. 17, 2012) – In the latest attack on attorney-client relationships at Guantanamo Bay, the U.S. Department of Justice now takes the position that Guantanamo detainees whose habeas corpus cases have been terminated no longer have the right of access to their lawyers and vice versa. Under a new “memorandum of understanding,” attorney-client visits and communications are permitted at the sole discretion of the Commander, Joint Task Force-Guantanamo.
The DOJ argues that a 2008 federal court protective order no longer governs attorney access for detainees whose habeas cases have been terminated. The military would decide whether a lawyer and his client could meet and would control access to all past and future communications (including the attorney’s own work product on previous cases). Under the conditions of the MOU, any disputes would be subject to “the final and unreviewable discretion” of the task force commander in coordination with the Defense Department’s Southern Command.
Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held a motions hearing on Friday morning and took the matter under advisement. A courtroom observer described the judge as skeptical of the government’s position.
On Monday, Aug. 13, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) filed a friend-of-the-court letter with Judge Lamberth in support of the detainees’ right to access to their lawyers. The letter encourages the court to rule that the 2008 protective order continues to apply to the detainees, and that the government cannot terminate the detainees’ access to their lawyers on their lawyers’ refusal to sign the MOU. In 2003 and 2012, NACDL issued Ethics Advisory Opinions 03-04 and 12-02, respectively, reminding counsel that they many not “contract away” their clients rights, especially the right to effective assistance of counsel and the attorney-client privilege, to the government. Ethics Opinion 12-02, issued in February of this year, reminds military and civilian counsel with Guantanamo clients that attorneys have an ethical and constitutional duty to challenge the substance of JTF administrative orders that interfere with meaningful communications, thereby preventing competent representation.
NACDL President Steven D. Benjamin said, “The American judicial system is the best in the world because our adversarial trial proceedings are designed to determine the truth. Interference with the attorney-client relationship undermines the truth-seeking function of that process, rendering proceedings more about achieving a predetermined result than about determining truth and doing justice.”
“Without proper access to counsel, a person's right to petition and be heard by the courts can be rendered meaningless.” Benjamin said. “As these proceedings continue, the need for uncompromised representation becomes greater, not less.”
A copy of NACDL’s letter brief is available for downloading at http://www.nacdl.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=24913&libID=24882.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
Jack King, Director of Public Affairs & Communications, (202) 465-7628 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.