Washington has a statute permitting, but not requiring, recording of custodial interrogations.
Citation: Wash. Rev. Code § 9.73.090.
Video and/or sound recordings may be made of arrested persons by police officers responsible for making arrests or holding persons in custody before their first appearance in court. Such video and/or sound recordings shall conform strictly to the following:
- The arrested person shall be informed that such recording is being made and the statement so informing him or her shall be included in the recording;
- The recording shall commence with an indication of the time of the beginning thereof and terminate with an indication of the time thereof;
- At the commencement of the recording the arrested person shall be fully informed of his or her constitutional rights, and such statements informing him or her shall be included in the recording;
- The recordings shall only be used for valid police or court activities.
State v. Mazzante, 86 Wash. App. 425, 428, 936 P.2d 1206, 1208 (1997): “Generally, recordings that fail to comply strictly with statutory requirements are inadmissible . . . In order to satisfy [Wash. Rev. Code § 9.73.090], a recorded statement must contain a full statement of the defendant’s Miranda rights.”
State v. Cunningham, 93 Wash. 2d 823, 829, 613 P.2d 1139, 1143–44 (1980):
Insofar as we are here concerned, RCW 9.73.090 is specifically aimed at the specialized activity of police taking recorded statements from arrested persons, as distinguished from the general public. While mere consent may be wholly sufficient to protect members of the general public whose statements have been recorded under noncustodial conditions, such is not true when dealing with persons whose statements have been taken while under custodial arrest. In the latter situation, consent alone has been deemed insufficient. The legislature has authorized police to make sound recordings of statements made by arrested persons only under carefully circumscribed conditions. The recordings are required to ‘conform strictly’ to rules which ensure that waiver by consent authorized by RCW 9.73.030 is capable of proof by the recording itself thereby avoiding a ‘swearing contest.’
The . . . statutory provisions, when adhered to strictly, will establish within the recording itself that a defendant’s consent was given only after being informed the statement would be recorded; that the consent and resultant statement were given only after being fully informed of one’s constitutional rights, including the exact information imparted; and that the statement was not obtained by means of oppressively long interrogation or interrogation that occurred at unreasonable times or in unreasonable sequences.
Departments we have identified that presently record:
|Adams CS||Grandview PD||Quincy|
|Bellevue||Kent City||Snohomish CS|
|Bellingham||King CS||State Patrol|
|Buckley||Kittitas CS||Thurston CS|
|Clark CS||Klickitat CS||Toppenish|
|Columbia CS||Lewis CS||Univ. WA|
|Cowlitz CS||Lynden||Walla Walla|
|Enumclaw||Mount Vernon||Whatcom CS|
|Everett||Pierce CS||Yakima CS|
|Federal Way||Port Angeles||Yakima|
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.