The death penalty has always been, and continues to be, disproportionately wielded against Black people and other people of color. Disparities in the makeup of the death row population are clear:
- Black and Hispanic people represent 31% of the U.S. population, but 53% of death row inmates—41.9% and 11.3% respectively (American Progress, 2019).
- The death row population is over 41% Black, even though Black people make up about 13% of the U.S. population (Prison Policy Initiative, 2016).
The scale of the federal death penalty expanded with the passage of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, also known as the crime bill, which added 60 new offenses to the list of those eligible for the death penalty. In the five years after the passage of the crime bill, 74% of defendants given death penalty recommendations by federal prosecutors were people of color—44% of these defendants were Black and 21% were Hispanic (American Progress, 2019). The majority of individuals on death row in federal prisons are from a small number of jurisdictions who disproportionately apply the death penalty. More than a third are from Texas, Virginia, and the Eastern District of Missouri, and in these jurisdictions, more than 90% of individuals on death row are people of color (Death Penalty Information Center).
Even greater than the disparities in the race of defendants are the disparities in the race of victims. Studies at the state and local level demonstrate these disparities, and the impact of racism on death penalty outcomes:
- A 2017 study in Oklahoma found that “cases with white female victims, cases with white male victims, and cases with minority female victims are significantly more likely to end with a death sentence in Oklahoma than are cases with non-white male victims.”
- A 2014 study in Washington State found that jurors are three times more likely to recommend a death sentence for a black defendant than for a white defendant in a similar case (Death Penalty Information Center).
- In Louisiana, the odds of a death sentence were 97% higher for those whose victim was white than for those whose victim was black. (Pierce & Radelet, Louisiana Law Review, 2011).
- A 2006 study on 600 death-eligible cases from Philadelphia between 1979 and 1999 found that “in cases involving a White victim, the more stereotypically Black a defendant is perceived to be, the more likely that person is to be sentenced to death.”
- A 2005 study in California found that homicides with white victims are 3.7 times as likely to result in the death penalty as homicides with African American victims and 4.73 times as likely as homicides with Hispanic victims.
More on Race and the Death Penalty
Enduring Injustice: The Persistence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Death Penalty, Death Penalty Information Center, September 2020.
A Systemic Lottery: The Texas Death Penalty, 1976 to 2016 by Scott Phillips and Trent Steidley, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2020.
- Policy Issues: Race, Death Penalty Information Center.
- Race and Death Sentencing for Oklahoma Homicides Committed Between 1990 and 2012, Pierce, Radelet, and Sharp, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 2017.
- The Criminal Justice System is Riddled with Racial Disparities, Prison Policy Initiative, August 2016.
- The Role of Race in Washington State Capital Sentencing, 1981-2014, Katherine Becket and Heather Evans, University of Washington, 2014.
- Looking Deathworthy: Perceived Stereotypicality of Black Defendants Predicts Capital-Sentencing Outcomes, Eberhard, Davis, Purdie-Vaugns, and Johnson, Psychological Science, May 2006.
- Killing with Prejudice: Race and the Death Penalty in the USA, Amnesty International, May 1999.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.