Renewed War on Drugs, harsher charging policies, stepped-up criminalization of immigrants — in the current climate, joining the NACDL is more important than ever. Members of NACDL help to support the only national organization working at all levels of government to ensure that the voice of the defense bar is heard.
Take a stand for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system
Contact members of congress, sign petitions, and more
Help us continue our fight by donating to NFCJ
Help shape the future of the association
Join the dedicated and passionate team at NACDL
Increase brand exposure while building trust and credibility
NACDL is committed to enhancing the capacity of the criminal defense bar to safeguard fundamental constitutional rights.
NACDL harnesses the unique perspectives of NACDL members to advocate for policy and practice improvements in the criminal legal system.
NACDL envisions a society where all individuals receive fair, rational, and humane treatment within the criminal legal system.
NACDL’s mission is to serve as a leader, alongside diverse coalitions, in identifying and reforming flaws and inequities in the criminal legal system, and redressing systemic racism, and ensuring that its members and others in the criminal defense bar are fully equipped to serve all accused persons at the highest level.
Showing 1 - 15 of 22 results
Amicus Brief
Argument: Amicus brief filed on behalf of compassionate release motion discussing the over-criminization of marijuana; the significant changes in marijuana laws over the years, and arguing that incarceration of non-violent cannabis offenders fails to serve the public interest.
Opinion and Order
Argument: Case started out as an excessive sentence case (the two §851s that created life mandatory mininum wouldn't apply today), but due to bad case law in Sixth Cicuit, attorney Chloe Smith smartly pivoted to more traditional/COVID arguments. After Judge Danny Reeves in the EDKY denied the motion, Chloe appealed the denial of the CR motion to the Sixth Circuit.
The Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded the district court’s denial of compassionate release to a 90-year-old, terminally ill, bedridden defendant serving mandatory life for non-violent marijuana offense that would only be subject to a 10-year mandatory minimum today. In reversing, the Sixth Circuit found that the “district court’s analysis of the 18 U.S.C § 3553(a) factors leaves us “ ‘with a definite and firm conviction that the district court committed a clear error of judgment.’ ”
By overly emphasizing Estrada-Elias’s history of nonviolent crimes, ignoring the low likelihood that Estrada-Elias will re-offend, and mischaracterizing the reality of the gap between Estrada-Elias’s present and prior convictions, the district court engaged in a substantively unreasonable balancing of the § 3553(a) factors and therefore abused its discretion.
The court reversed and remanded for Judge Reeves to make a finding on extraordinary and compelling reasons prong, which it has assumed applied without actually holding as such.
The Delaware Cannabis Policy Coalition, of which NACDL is a member, is advocating for the passage of legislation to legalize cannabis in Delaware.
NACDL worked with the Yes We Cannabis RI coalition to successfully advocate for the legalization of marijuana in Rhode Island.
Written Testimony of Monica L. Reid, Senior Director of Advocacy, on behalf of NACDL to the Delaware House Health and Human Development Committee in Support of HB 371, which would legalize the use and possession of small amounts of cannabis for adults 21 and older. Submitted on May 3, 2022.
In Part II of the discussion on Race and Collateral Consequences, we explore how the use of “moral character” clauses, like those used in state bar licensing, can prevent individuals with convictions from participating in the legal profession. We also discuss a range of restrictions to entrepreneurial ventures that people with criminal convictions face that range from limiting a person’s ability to access capital through loans to barring participation in the legal, regulated cannabis industry.
20th Annual State Criminal Justice Network Conference August 18-20, 2021 | Held Virtually
Hear from state and national experts who will explore a range of strategies adopted to account for the devastating impacts of the war on drugs, highlighting the most effective modes of providing relief for individuals with prior cannabis convictions.
NACDL, as part of the Maryland Cannabis Policy Coalition, successfully advocated for legislation to advance marijuana legalization in Maryland.
NACDL successfully opposed legislation to expand marijuana criminalization.
Letter to members of the Delaware General Assembly in support of HB 305, which would have legalized cannabis in the state.
Introduction to the Cannabis Justice Initiative, part of NACDL's Return to Freedom Project, presented by John Albanes, Legal Director of the Return to Freedom Project, NACDL; and Sarah Gersten, General Counsel and Executive Director of Last Prisoner Project
"This PBS Spotlight segment highlights the injustice of cannabis prosecution. Notably featured in this specific film is the work of The Last Prisoner Project, a nonprofit focused on cannabis criminal justice reform. Presented by The Beehouse Justice Initiative, a New York City organization dedicated to healing 'some of the harms caused by disparate enforcement of cannabis prohibition' and video production company Matador Content, the film is narrated by Chris Rock and directed by Ezra Paek." - Last Prisoner Project
Order granting motion for compassionate release.
Argument: Defendant is 72, an insulin dependent diabetic, has asthma, anemia, and end stage (stage 5) kidney disease. The Court concludes, "Defendant does not now present a risk of danger to the community as articulated in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). Defendant’s advanced age and medical condition have alleviated any risk Defendant previously posed to the community. The Court has reviewed all the factors to be considered in imposing a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and does not find any one factor or combination of factors to preclude the remedy here."
Memorandum and Order granting compassionate release.
Argument: Following a jury trial in 1999, Pullen was convicted of one count of possession with intent to distribute approximately 320 pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Judge states in the order, "significantly, Pullen has already served a sentence [180months] that far exceeds the top end of the Guidelines that would have applied here, and there is nothing about this case that suggests an above Guidelines sentence is warranted."
The Court addresses Defendant's Amended Motion for Compassionate Release.
Argument: The Court concludes that a sentence of 240 months is excessive and a sentence reduction to 180 months is warranted, when considering the statutory sentencing factors and the aggravating factors (second offense) in this specific case.