Due Process, Transparency, and Appellate Review Protect America's Reputation for Justice
Washington, DC (November 17, 2010) – Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani was convicted today in a federal district court for his role the 1998 bombing of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. The conviction carries a maximum sentence of life in prison and a minimum of 20 years. The jury acquitted Mr. Ghailani of more serious charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, for which there was scant evidence.
Commenting on the verdict, Jim E. Lavine, President of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, issued the following statement:
The trial took place in a constitutional court, under rules of evidence and laws that comport with traditional American justice and values, and is subject to constitutional review by federal appeals courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
Tonight's verdict again demonstrates that the federal courts are capable of trying defendants accused of terrorism charges. Despite public fears, more than 150 other terrorism cases alleging ties to Islamic extremism have been tried in federal courts in New York, Washington, Virginia, and other courthouses around the country without a single documented threat to public safety or security breach.
Military commissions may predictably provide convictions, but federal criminal courts provide more reliable convictions because they do not rely on secret evidence, hearsay, and coerced confessions. According to the Center on Law and Security, there have been more than 998 persons indicted by the Justice Department for terrorism-related charges since September 11, 2001.1 All these cases show that the federal court system can weigh the prosecution's case and reach an appropriate disposition. Guantanamo detainees can be safely tried in federal courts, consistent with the rule of law, and the government is capable of obtaining convictions fairly, transparently and without resort to evidence obtained through torture and “enhanced interrogation techniques.”
1 Karen J. Greenberg, et al., Terrorist Trial Report Card: September 11, 2001-September 11, 2010, Center on Law and Security, New York University School of Law (2010). http://www.lawandsecurity.org/publications/TTRC2010Final1.pdf
Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy Guide
NACDL’s Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence will assist criminal defense practitioners in scoring points when cross-examining forensic experts in cases involving DNA and biological evidence. This resource contains thousands of questions that will help defense lawyers cross-examine challenging witnesses without reinventing the wheel with each new case. It includes pattern questions that can be used to dominate prosecution DNA experts and level the playing field at trial.
Cross-Examination of the Analyst in Drug Prosecutions (2nd Ed.) By James M. Shellow
Now in its second edition with some new material, James M. Shellow’s book offers what its title promises: ways of thinking about cross-examining the forensic analysts in drug cases. But the book is so much more than that. It offers a look inside the mind of one of the finest cross-examiners and defense lawyers the United States has produced in the last seventy years. This small book can inspire and direct you in making big changes in the way you defend your clients and think about the entire project of trying any case.
Justice For All, Justice Now White T-Shirt (Women’s)
This custom, vintage-faded NACDL t-shirt is 50% polyester, 25% cotton, and 25% rayon weighing 5.2 oz. and is lightwieght, flexible and soft, providing maximum comfort. It features the "Justice For All, Justice Now" slogan and Lady Liberty image on the front, with the NACDL logo on the back. Currently available in both men's and women's sizes in both black and white colors. View the full line-up of colors and sizes on our online store, as well as our other popular and best-selling t-shirt designs at: nacdl.org/store.
Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection - CD-ROM
NACDL’s Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection is the sweeping culmination of every single article of written materials ever published from each installment of NACDL's annual "Defending Modern Drug Cases" seminar. Totaling over 12,000 pages, this vast collection includes 12+ years of motions, briefs, reports, outlines, transcripts, case citations, scholarly articles, powerpoints and other written commentaries. This collection provides trial strategies and tactics you can immediately apply to your current cases.
Mental Illness & the Law: Addressing and Litigating Behavioral Health Disorders in Criminal Cases
Whether it is insanity, impairment, a disorder, or adolescent brain development; mental health and intellectual competence issues affect pretrial supervision, trial and sentencing, and your chances of successfully advocating for your impaired client. This training provides ideas and proven solutions to assist you in advocating for your client during trial, whether it be insanity defenses, jury selection, cross of expert witnesses, persuasion, or mitigation at sentencing.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.