- New York has a three-strikes law that mandates indeterminate life sentences upon conviction for a third violent felony.
Art. 1, §5. Bail; fines; punishments; detention of witnesses: Excessive bail shall not be required nor excessive fines imposed, nor shall cruel and unusual punishments be inflicted, nor shall witnesses by unreasonably detained.
Persistent Violent Felony Offender statute
New York has a statute that mandates minimum indeterminate life sentences for those convicted of their third violent felonies. The minimum time that must be served depends on the severity of the third felony, and ranges from 12-25 years. N.Y. Penal Law §70.08(3). Effective September 1, 2013, the minimum range will shift to 6-25 years. N.Y. Penal Law §70.08 (McKinney).
Statutory sentence appeals
State law permits appellate courts to set aside sentences that are invalid as a matter of law (when the terms of the sentence are not authorized, when the sentence is based upon an erroneous determination that a defendant had a previous conviction, or when probation has been improperly revoked) or “harsh or excessive.” N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law §450.30(1).
Youthful offender statute
Courts are allowed to grant offenders between the ages of 16 and 19 “youthful offender” status, which allows offenders to avoid a criminal conviction on their records and sets lower maximum sentences for certain crimes. Eligible youth must receive youthful offender classification if they were convicted in a local criminal court and have no prior record of criminal or youthful offender convictions. N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law §720.20.
To be sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender, the two prior felonies must not have been part of the same event or transaction. People v. Morse, 62 N.Y.2d 205, 223-24 (1984).
Sentences are evaluated under an abuse of discretion standard. People v. Hochberg, 62 A.D.2d 239, 251 (3 Dept. 1978). When evaluating whether a sentence is harsh or excessive, a sentence should not be disturbed without a showing of “extraordinary circumstances.” People v. Mabry, 101 A.D.2d 961, 962 (3 Dept. 1984).
The state’s persistent violent felony offender statute contains no requirement that qualifying convictions result in imprisonment; thus, a defendant may be sentenced as a persistent violent offender even if he received probation for a prior offense. People v. Harrison, 248 A.D.2d 174, 175 (1 Dept. 1998).
The determination of whether a sentence is to be served “at hard labor” or under standard prison employment conditions is a decision for the Department of Corrections, not the trial court. People v. Johnson, 216 A.D.2d 583, 584 (1995).
The state constitution prohibits punishments that are “grossly disproportionate” to the crime. People v. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, 111-12 (1975).
The gravity of the offense and gravity of the danger the offender poses to society are key factors in the gross proportionality analysis. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d at 112. When considering the gravity of the criminal offense, the main concern is the harm the offense causes to society. Id. The reviewing court also considers (1) the crime’s comparative seriousness in light of the punishments for other state crimes and for the same offense in other jurisdictions; as well as (2) the punishment in comparison to the punishment received by any other charged participant. People v. Thompson, 83. N.Y.2d 477, 485 (1994).
A sentence within a valid statutory range is not ordinarily cruel and unusual, regardless of the sentence’s severity. People v. Jones, 39 N.Y.2d 694 (1976) (upholding a sentence of 15 years to life for drug possession when other defendants who were involved in the same drug packaging operation received much lighter sentences; defendant had turned down an offer of a lighter sentence in exchange for a guilty plea to a lesser charge).
Court upheld sentence of 15 years to life for 17-year-old convicted of cocaine distribution. Thompson, 83 N.Y.2d at 482.
Continue reading below
This is a sponsored ad
Manage Your Law Firm All in One Place
Court upheld sentence of 9 years to life for man convicted of criminal possession of a dangerous weapon under the state’s persistent violent felony offender statute. People v. Ortiz, 254 A.D.2d 27 (1 Dept. 1998).
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.