In July 2009, after a six-week jury trial in the Southern District of New York, Frederic Bourke Jr., co-founder of Dooney & Bourke, was found guilty of making false statements and violating FCPA. Prosecutors alleged that Bourke knew of a plot by Viktor Kozeny to bribe Azerbaijani officials to let Kozeny's investment group buy a stake in the state’s oil company in the late 1990s. Bourke was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin to a year and a day in prison. Judge Scheindlin explained her sentence by stating: “After years of supervising this case, it’s still not entirely clear to me whether Mr. Bourke is a victim or a crook or a little bit of both.” On appeal, defense attorneys for Bourke argued that the prosecutors used perjured testimony in order to obtain a conviction. After several unsuccessful appeals to the Second Circuit, Bourke began his sentence in May 2013. Viktor Kozeny, the apparent orchestrator of the scheme, has avoided extradition to the United States by remaining in the Bahamas.
"Bourke's last stand?," The FCPA Blog, May 10, 2013.
"Supreme Court denies Bourke review," The FCPA Blog, April 16, 2013.
"Bourke Alleges False Testimony In New Appeal," The Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2012.
"Bourke Loses Bid For New FCPA Trial In Second Legal Setback," Bloomberg, December, 15, 2011.
"Judges Appear Unmoved by Bourke's Arguments on Appeal," Global Investigations Review, February 15, 2011.
"Jury Finds Frederic Bourke Guilty of Bribery-Related Charges," The Wall Street Journal Law Blog, July 10, 2009.
Brief on Appeal, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. April 1, 2010)
Reply Memo in Support of Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. June 17, 2011)
Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. March 9, 2011)
Brief on Appeal, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (2nd Cir. July 29, 2010)
Opposition to Defendant's Requests for Certain Jury Instructions Related to His Possible Affirmative Defenses, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2008)
Continue reading below
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
Order Denying Post-Trial Motions, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. December 13, 2009)
Jury Charge, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)
Indictment, United States v. Kozeny et al., No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2005)